Let's just agree to put aside the argument that "The Hobbit " , he says , a book for children, but the " Lord of the Rings" - a work for adults, and therefore , the film adaptation of these works must be radically different. First, this queer theory refutes the creators of the trilogy , as neither one of its scenes of "The Hobbit : An Unexpected Journey " does not look like an innocent children's story . Secondly , we 're not talking about the difference between the literary source material , and how integral work is the film adaptation of themselves .
And , once we have agreed not to return more to this issue , then let's talk about the trailer.
At times, pictures of him did not even resemble a video game , in which the graphics are often just as good cinema , and concept art , that is, patterns that make illustrators in the early stages of pre-production .
General background colors and artificial lighting so that the frames do not seem to be created with the help of modern software, and hand-drawn by the artist , fanateyuschim of fantasy . It is clear that overreliance on computer graphics instead of the intelligent combination of practical and cartoon effects destroys the sense of presence .
Absolute " cartoony" elves that in the teaser could be explained by the incomplete special effects will not go away . As if there was the ten years that have passed since the release of " Return of the King ", which is just as animated Legolas rode on huge elephants.
Does not go away and let the feeling and very high quality , but the television plays .
But the most annoying thing is that in the new trailer and , apparently, in the film , the focus is not on the internal content , not on the drama of the story and its unique style of presentation , and the now iconic characters , the fact that they appear in the frame. " Look, - as if the creators say ," The Hobbit 2 "- we already have Legolas . Remember how great he waves his swords ? " . And you , the audience , Legolas with blue eyes and brought to the level of glow in the dark.
And, of course , Gandalf preachy . More precisely , who plays Gandalf in Ian McKellen . Grotesque parody of himself from the " Lord of the Rings." No taker for the soul of " run, fools " is not expected.
That is, there is an obvious attempt to replace a fascinating story and narrative skill deliberately bows in the direction of the reference product . At the time, these " flashbacks " do a disservice to many films . And it is , alas, only one - the lack of " soul" , which literally flooding the space while watching "The Lord of the Rings."
No comments:
Post a Comment